Update 04.02.2010 + 17.02.2010: MRI is safe, the contrast agent only kills
Update 17.02.2010 MRI is safe, the contrast agent only kills.
What can you do when you have had an MRI and you experience symptoms?
These symptoms may appear days or weeks after the MRI. The treating
physician may not associate these with MRI and may not even know that you
have had one.
I've been contacted by therapists who use bio-feedback systems, they
suggest it may be possible to detect a change in "Aura", "Human Energy
Field", or whatever terminology the manufacturer of the system uses.
Bio-feedback systems are widely used in Central Europe and to a much
lesser extend in the English speaking hemisphere. They originate in Russia
and Germany where even big manufacturers of medical equipment are getting
into this market.
Gadolinium will have caused the damage while it was present in your body,
resulting in a change of your aura or energy field. This change will
persists after gadolinium is flushed out of your body. Bio-feedback may
also detect gadolinium residues that have not been flushed out.
Do you have a bio-feedback system of any make? Please get in touch with me.
When Toyota has a problem with a gas pedal the mass media gets excited and
the whole world discusses possible implications. Shares fall, politicians
add their two cents and the survival of the human species is in danger.
Arguably this generates advertising revenue from competitors.
When gadodiamide based contrast agents get injected into millions of
people the mass media does not get excited and chooses to ignore the
issue.
Arguably exposing this threat would not generate advertising revenue as
there are no competitors. Gadodiamides are produced throughout Big Pharma.
Bayer produces the market leader Magnevist, Omniscan by GE Healthcare,
Optimark by the Covidien unit Mallinkrodt, MultiHance and ProHance by
Bracco Diagnostics, to name but a few.
Neither physicians who provide MRI nor the public is informed about how
much gadolinium is released by which contrast agent and under what
circumstances. The information about damage done is elusive in most cases.
The reporting chain seems not to be working.
When a patient develops symptoms days or weeks after an MRI he/she is in
the care of the regular physician who knows little about NSF and does not
associate symptoms with MRI. The MRI provider never learns about these
cases.
MRI providers experience instant adverse reactions, and these are
plentiful.
Reports about these are pouring in, thank you, keep sending them.
I quote from one of these reports:
"I was sent for an MRI on June 16 to determine the size of the cancer in
my left breast. I did not know that the procedure included I.V. injection
of gadolinium contrasting agent into my veins. I had no time to research
or understand what the substance was.
I had to sign a release about the gadolinium in order to have the MRI. The
MRI technician told me that gadolinium was a problem only for people with
kidney disease."
The patient in question did not have any kidney disease before the MRI.
The patient developed severe, debilitating symptoms thereafter that
persist until today.
Why should you have to "sign a release" if you have no kidney disease?
This indicates that problems are known that go beyond the stage of "kidney
disease".
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
You have received this infoholix.net newsletter as subscriber to infoholix.net, Llanidloes, Powys SY18 6JT, Mid-Wales, UK.
We have a strict anti-spam policy. We know how important your privacy is to you. That's why we do not share your email address with anyone.
Reprint of web pages are only allowed with explicit permission. Please request our permission by emailing us with a complete description of the intended use.
infoholix.net 
